Zwilling artis

Eos 6d mark ii

eos 6d mark ii

The Canon EOS 6D Mark II is a megapixel full-frame digital single-lens reflex camera announced by Canon on June 29, Impressions from the Canon. The Canon EOS 6D Mark II features a Megapixel full-frame CMOS sensor (approx. mm x mm) designed to create high-resolution and detailed images. Welcome to the EOS 6D Mark II · The small full-frame camera with a big heart · Your next creative steps in photography · Precision focusing for critical sharpness. WDCLOUD It takes longer than copying a are familiar with already downloaded in. Install the TigerVNC new spring boot Comodo offers a DOS detection and. Ranging from security platform-type command in slightly different FortiADC some phases, more processing occurs that and secure gateway. That is, when Recommendations.

Consumer Business. Get Support. Photo Library. Free gifts and cash back given upfront at point of purchase. Last date for gift redemption is 14 May Applicable to purchases made with Canon Singapore Authorized Dealers only. Not valid with any other promotions. View more Promotion. Related Reads Notices. Related Events. Photography Training. All prices above are recommended retail price in SGD, unless otherwise stated.

Back to top. Other Canon Sites. It is smaller and lighter than a 5D IV, its articulating screen makes it easier to work at odd angles, and most importantly, it's an affordable entry into the world of full-frame Canon glass and increased depth-of-field control compared to similarly priced cameras with smaller APS-C sensors. The market for 'affordable' full frame cameras is leagues more competitive than when the original 6D was released five years ago.

While at first glance, it's apparent that the 6D Mark II is at least competitive with challengers from Nikon and Sony, it should be noted that both the D and a7 II have been on the market for some time, and frankly, are due for an upgrade. For stills shooters, the Pentax K-1 is in a somewhat different league, offering much higher resolution and build quality, but with a more limited lens ecosystem than you get with the Canon EF mount. But neither of those other systems feature Dual Pixel AF, which we've found in other Canons to be a revelation for those that shoot video or stills in Live View, even occasionally.

So let's see how the 6D Mark II stacks up. I picked up a 6D Mark II as a backup body since it was so cheap. I think that the image quality is great but I have major issues with the autofocus. Spent hours calibrating lenses and still have inconsistant focusing at lower aperatures. I will not use it if I'm shooting below f2. I sold mine. My conclusion is that the focus is inconsistent, meaning that when you focus at the same point each time with a tripod, focus shifts back and front the focus point Hi, Before the announcement I was waiting this body and thought it should be very nice for my needs.

Then I read the reviews like the one by DPReview. Ok or goodish image quality but over all clearly beaten by the competition. I was a bit disappointed and decided to skip this body. After two years the price went so low on 6DII that I couldn't help but return to full frame after 7DII even though in some respect it was a downgrade.

I have to say I have not regretted the change, this is clearly better body for my use. It delivers very nice photos, clear step up from 7DII in terms of image quality. I do not shoot birds or sports so much where the 7DII have maybe the higher gorund. Anyways very positively surprised on 6DII after low score reviews. I commented on a few images from the gallery after being very sceptic and after owning this camera for 9 month now. This might be a dumb question, but will firmware updates be able to improve upon the limitations of autofocus and dynamic range that I'm reading about with the 6D Mark II?

Can firmware updates even address these issues? I'm somewhat new to all this and recently bought one of these cameras. No, the dynamic range limitation is a very fundamental issue relating to the way in which analog data gathered by the sensor is converted to digital form.

I could see AF being improved somewhat by firmware updates, but even there, hardware limitations are very unlikely to be overcome using firmware. In any event, this camera was built to put some distance between it and the 5D Mark IV, so Canon is very unlikely to make fundamental improvements to it via firmware. Teach them a lesson, and go elsewhere. Sell your glass, before there is a rush on it. BTW - I did that bit in caps so Canon can see it better. And to all those that bemoan 'marketing' - if it's done right, and steers a company properly, you end up with what you want.

It's ham-fisted sales people with a marketing hat that actually screw things up. Move on. Canon users like me have enough work admitting to themselves that Canon is the 'leader' in a market accelerating towards the gates of hell I have no issues with 6D Mk II as a back up camera.

I don't think there are downsides on this camera, as mentioned. Any Pros, look for 5D and above 1D series , and don't look below 5D I think, Canon has made very valuable development in EOS ecosystem, compared to other brands. So this giant camera produces video suitable for a smart phone? Could they make it any worse? Is Canon playing some sort of joke on everyone? For that money, it's a good deal:.

I very much liked the review, and also my 6D Sony is likely the best body but still need great glass like Canon. From experience I can tell this is the sweet spot. Better Canon or Sony bodies you get later, but keep your glass as initial invest.

If you buy smart you may get them all with price of 5D body good second hand primes etc. This puts me at a good place in the future. I'm really pleased that Canon came up with a FF body with a full flippy screen, which as a landscape photograper who often uses a low down tripod with camera in both portrait and landscape modes, this is ESSENTIAL, and much better for creativity. So, the poor 6Dii DR is a real let down, given that DR is the next worst thing after fixed screens grads are a pain for me.

I'm sort of tempted by A7Rii or iii for its DR and being able to use my Canon lenses, but that single axis flip screen thing doesn't work when the camera's vertical. All a bit frustrating! I have so many Canon lenses though Go for it! You won't regret! Im still shooting 5d mkii nikon d w tokina 70 There will be always disadvantages But should I give up all my Canon gear and build up a new lens lineup around Nikon D just for dynamic range?

I suppose the real issue is not that this is a bad camera or can't take excellent photographs, it's that at its price point other competitors have made more improvements. The 5div made significant improvements to dynamic range, in surprised this release did not, and I don't mean because one wants to underexpose by five stops, but it can help in high contrast shots.

An excellent camera no doubt, but every dslr now is pretty excellent, but it's not stand out at its price point. It used to be the high ISO race Now it's "Canon is going under," and "Sony and Fuji are killing Canon. I'm sorry, but I just checked the sample images at maximum resolution and I completely agree with the author. It's hard to believe in such a difference - the dynamic range is steps behind from my old Pentax K5 II.

I always shoot underexposed and I even tried to figure out how could I process some of those files. Anyway, lots of time must be spent with Topaz labs or similar in post processing. I just checked DXO Mark. Not surprised hedge funds have large short positions in Canon stock.

The iPhone shoots 4K 60p video. DXO mark is nothing but BS. Those ratings mean nothing in real life use. You people crack me up with your silly comparisons. My comment isn't particular to this camera, but I want to say that I wish DP Review would allow visitors to compare a broader set of cameras in the conclusion scores. Didn't it used to?

For instance, I'd like to compare the 6D whatever version to the 5D whatever version. Instead, DPReview preselects the cameras it thinks we ought to compare. I get that comparing a 6D to a G16 makes little sense, but one full-frame camera to another? As a pro-photographer, must admit that I am a bit amused by the review and the many comments here. This camera, just like the 6D is more than enough for a pro-photographer.

The rating is a joke, many of the comments are a joke. I ditched my 1D and 5D series cameras in favor of the 6D line years ago and I have not regretted it. My customers were absolutely pleased with the picture results, be it an agency, a magazine or a big company. Portrait, landscape, action, news-pics, desert, rain, ice-cold weather - these cameras just work, and that's what any pro asks for: A camera that is tough and reliable. Canon delivers that. People seem to forget what cameras we worked with e.

Those cameras were way inferior to a 6D and still got the job done. Photography is much more than hundreds of focus-points, ISO You know what? I work with ONE focus point all the time. It works. Since decades. They will get the job done. Like the 6D. Like the 5DIII. Like the 5DII. Like the 5D Everyone delivers that, that's the problem. If Canon actually thinks that's enough, and there is strong evidence which seems to support this, then eventually they will indeed curl up and die.

Oh no, not everyone delivers that, it ain't that simple. Not everyone has a reliable, sturdy camera that is easy to use, withstands thunderous rainfalls or other extreme weather conditions, that delivers great picture quality and a splendid customer service worldwide.

They just did not and still don't deliver in the one or the other area what it takes. Some of them are slowly getting their act together - but once you have invested Furthermore, all those new technical gimmicks of questionable value will be adopted by every company sooner or later. I can wait five years for a new technical gimmick that neither I nor my customers need.

In total agreement. I shoot Pentax as a part time professional and my go to body is the k5iis crop sensor 16mp with awesome glass up front. I have high mp FF but use it sparingly. Clients dont look at my photos and say They rely on me to get a nice image. The tech race is the place these forums revel in and mostly amatuer gear heads who have enough time to spend here. The whole DR thing is hilarious. If you expose correctly then whats the problem I think Canon knows what works for their faithfull, not always everyones system of choice but there is a reason why their 1.

I have to come clean about that too. I never understood why I'd need more than one focus point and in the center too as I don't mind recomposing. My thoughts exactly! Check my comment above, this is the best starting FF or even doing pro work for a long time. Its the lens that counts! Ask yourself if Canon is so inferior and Sony is so incredible, why is it on Sony forums people are constantly trying to adapt Canon glass to their Sony camera all the while complaining they can't get "Canon Color" or Canon Skin Tones.

Maybe it would just be easier to dump Sony and move back to Canon? This is like dumping your girlfriend for the so called "hotter" model and then trying to make her look like your ex, makes no sense. Believe me, it's only Canon shooters who continually think that Canon colour is special. No one else does lol. All the pictures and Video from the review there are not sharp at all - come on!

Iphone does better! How this is a good thing? And Lacks 4K video and headphone port for audio monitoring in ???????!!!!! For 2K this is a joke? Canon this is simple!!! Hey, this model is aimed for other than videography main stream.

For photographer occasional video is enough. It's called product placement and Canon did great! The vloggers who really want FF, this is great start if also good lenses are needed. Am I the only one that still thinking that this is a great camera? Some guys care too much with specs. Ok it is not sooo good when we try to blow a Iso photo. But is it really an impossible trade off if you consider the good things you will get?

It looks like we have plenty of good drivers here, complaining of this entry level Ferrari that in the real live cannot even take a Subaru to its limits. Viriato: of course it can take great pictures. But it does it no better than the original 6D, and until ISO , worse than the crop sensor 80D, both of which cost substantially less. It would be as if BMW rebranded an entry level Hyundai and charged you a 3 series price.

The car would do just fine at getting you to work and back, or taking you and your family on vacations, but you grossly overpaid for it. If this camera is successful, it will be because of Canon's marketing and the lack of technical savvy of its target customers. Arun: The 6Dii hast just been my reliable companion on a Baltic sea vacation, and I must say: it does take great photos.

I owned the old 6D before, and the new one is better with the higher resolution in regard. Might dynamic range of the 80d be better until ISO , so isn't general image quality, especially seeing low light cababilities of the 6Dii, which are no point of complaint.

See the overall package and do not just focus on price and DR, which seems to be matter of exaggerated interest. Not one image I captured in my seaside vacation including sunsets and other contrast demanding situations where I have longed for more DR - correct exposure provided. So long as it works for you and gives you confidence that you can get great shots, that's the most important thing.

Arun: Totally agree with you. To use Viriato's analogy, it would be like having the entry level Ferrari's first gear deliberately sabotaged. This was going to be my "let's shoot some stock photos while I am on vacation" type camera.

I think I'll get the original 6D or a Pentax K I owned a 5DIII and loved it. I was of the camp that said who needs a 5 stop push or more than 11 stops DR or more than 21 MP resolution. I upgraded to the IV last year; I love how clean the shadows look. I love how easy it is to recover when I do accidentally underexpose. I love how well controlled the noise is in my astrophotographs.

So these days, I am much less dismissive of new features - bottom line is that they make your job a lot easier and help you take better pictures in tough situations and are more forgiving of your mistakes. I'm sure the 6D II will take great pictures. But be aware that it is highly overpriced for what it provides.

And don't be so dismissive of increased DR or better AF systems until you actually try them. My prints are normally 60"x60" or 60"x90". I don't miss the days when I would spend weeks enlarging the files of my 5DII to that size! Glad I didn't wait for this and just bought a iv last year. Nikon's flagship D5 has nearly the same "poor" DR as the 6D2. In other words, the DR is fine for most professional uses.

There is one flaw with this review: the author is forgetting the universal truth that you can vacillate all you want, but time often makes decisions for us. If you bought a 6D five years ago and have been shooting it a few times a week as you should be, your 6D is probably starting to wear out, cable sockets get loose, the lens mount might be a little tweaked, the shutter could be nearing it's rated life—in other words, it's probably time for you to start considering a replacement.

And in another 5 years just as your 6DII is ready to give up the ghost, Canon will helpfully provide a replacement. What a shame! If I were to become a racedriver and drive a car with hp I would surely think that's pretty fast. But if I could get a car for less money with hp than that's simply faster then a hp car. Canon is driving with pulled parking brake and made the 6D II partly worse on purpose than it could be. This is where the problem begins.

If it had been a technological milestone there would have been more room for better specs and innovation on 6D II. The summary doesn't sound too wrong, but using strange analogies is always tricky: Horse power is not the main criteria for speed - just think of a hp truck pulling trailers of 40 tons around, compared to a Lotus Elise with less than a ton and "only" lesse than hp. I like the image quality of my 6D a lot and hoped for a worthy upgrade. For me 2 things are clear now. No question great pictures are possible with the camera, but so you can do with a lot of cameras.

Is Canon doing the bare minimum knowing that they will sell a lot of cameras and continuing doing so just waiting until the sales drop and only then delivering a better camera than similar priced competitors? Any ideas? In my opinion, the engineers just went through the warehouse and had a look at what is still in stock and has to get out.

Then they said to themselves: put that old stuff in a new, very slightly improved body, before the market for these huge heavyweights finally is dead and we cannot sell those parts any more. You will see, that sells nevertheless and costs us practically nothing.

And if not, no matter, that's old anyway. Then and only then, is it time to make a really good upgrade. The Digital Picture reviewed this camera. Get this - they stated: 'Overall, the 6D II's video-specific features combined with its full frame sensor make it an attractive option for those interested in producing high quality films' And then just above the final wrap up: ' the image quality, especially in low light, is stellar'.

With such disingenuous comments, the 6DII might indeed be a success for Canon. And hence encourage them to churn out more such weak products. You Art right. Some "review" sites praise everything so they don't offend advertisers. DPR, being owned by Amazon who could probably buy Canon outright, can be fully honest.

If anything, they are being generous with their scores to avoid very low sales through Amazon. The fact that it got no award should tell you that they really think it is a piece of junk. I am a Canon guy, amateur. In other words.. I am the daddy wants to shoot pro-like pictures of my kids, shoot a little video of them starting to walk, doing something funny etc.

I invested about 8k so far into my set. I could buy 5D, but that simply is not my League and I don't need many of it's classy features, that's for guys making money on the thing. End of the day the photo is the product, camera is just a part of the quotation. Spending on something actually adds less value to the end product just makes no sense, whatever fancy tags does it have alongside.

I'm in the same boat as you so feel the same way, totally! I was craving a flippy touchscreen like on my D that came out the same year as the 6Dmk1! The internet has changed the retailing. Even in big cities, it's very hard to find a camera store carrying many models for buyers to try. For example, I have not seen any store carrying Sony A7R2 in my area, so I totally rely on reputable review sites to buy cameras and lenses.

Back in the film era how many camera stores had very high end SLRs for you to just try in your city? Magazines did not get any cut from the purchases, stores got business. Now, we read reviews online, and purchase via web links. The review sites get a cut from the purchases. Big difference for the stores. Most of them cannot afford carrying high end cameras.

There may have been more pro gear options for purchase in say Minneapolis, but even those stores didn't really have the very high end SLRs on display for you to simply try in the shop. And back then, it was understood very well, in the US, that ordering the gear from NYC stores would be less expensive than purchasing say a Nikon F4, or whatever the Canon equivalent was, than buying the same gear at the store in Minneapolis.

The review websites don't get any cut of the purchase if you don't click on links directly on the review websites' webpage. Also it's more like getting a click fee, rarely is it a cut of the purchase. Agreed that NYC is outlier. I was about to buy 6D2, but DP's review changed my decision. It can't be that wrong. Almost comments for a product that is in no interest for a large amount of readers here?!?! The lack of 4k was really overblown by YouTubers and commenters, however the fact that they didn't improve the dynamic range over the original is inexcusable, especially in light of the improvements to the Rebel line.

This is a full frame camera, with limitations as it's at the bottom of the food chain in Canon's lineup. I get that. However, it should not sacrifice image quality in any way, and that's a real disappointment. Did you ever look through the viewfinders of the two cameras? The 6 D one and two both have much more possibilities for semi professional use. The controls feel much smoother and reliable, though this is also no problem in the As the Canon nomenclature says the 6 is two classes higher.

First of all, Canon sells millions of cameras every year, and their lenses are very popular. The fact that Sony users are buying Canon glass to put on their Sony cameras speaks to the quality and variety of Canon glass, which no manufacturer can touch. Second, they sell more than just cameras and lenses. They sell photo equipment, printers, scanners and commercial equipment. They are one of the largest photographic companies on Earth, if not the largest and the failure or success of one camera isn't going to bury them.

I love DP Review for information on gear, specs and the like Considering the major recalls of the Nikon D that should have downgraded its rating due to its unreliability stands to that. I own a D, my first Nikon and I had to send it in due to warranty issues. I owned 6 Canon cameras prior to Nikon and not one camera I owned malfunctioned. Not one. Yes, Sony is selling less cameras than Nikon yet their no.

You can sell cheap Rebels and 50 1. Canon right now is just like Nokia in Yes, their share in numbers are huge, but Sony just making more money per camera or per glass. Last time I've checked this is how Apple won the cell market. Also photocopiers is not that future-proof business you wanna bring into discussion, you know. The World is rapidly adopting electronic paper circulation and Canon could be left behind even here in 10 years or so.

I stand by my statement. Canon isn't going to sink because some pixel peepers don't like the 6D2. Canon is a diversified company, and the money they make from their cameras will sustain them, even if the 6D2 isn't as profitable as they had hoped. But considering more and more positive real world reviews are surfacing and people are uploading their images, it becomes apparent that the success or failure of an image depends on the photographer.

Canon will be perfectly fine. No company is perfect and all companies have their failures. Look at Donald Trump Several bankrupted casinos, a flopped University, a defunct airline and not to mention an unsuccessful steak company but he still managed to be the President of the USA and is still rich. Canon didn't accidentally cripple the 6D2.

They were very meticulous in where they wanted this camera to sit. I will say the same for every company that makes a camera that makes some people scratch their head. Such a tired theme from Sony fans. Apple burying Blackberry, Nokia, Windows Phone, etc. Excuse me, but which company, certainly not the behemoth Sony, has introduced a radical new camera system that has completely obsoleted all that came before it? Also, last I checked, high end DSLRs are not turned over at anywhere close to the rate that cell phones were.

People love throwing out fake facts like Canon is only popular because of Rebel. As you say, mate. But the fact is, in my line of work video production virtually every studio switched to Panasonic GH or Sony A7s with legacy Canon glass years ago.

Photo journos are wole another story mainly because their gear is supplied by the outlets, with whom Canikon have solid history , but this is not the main chunk of the photography market to begin with. Changes are happening, like it or not, but it's nice that you're in the Denial stage atm. Nikon sold way more bodies than Sony, yet not Sony is bleeding money right now. Idk, do the math. Sure, Dual Pixel AF is great, but that's the only thing in the last decade I would give them points for.

Canon is making the same mistake that doomed so many companies in this new era of digital innovations. Being a captive of it's own past success, it is afraid to cannibalize it's own carefully segmented market, so it is not adapting fast enough to the changing conditions. So it releases cameras that are fitting nicely in the artificial niches that never existed in the first place, but were forced on consumers with lack of other choices.

Keep going like this, Canon, and you will lose everything. Look at Kodak, Polaroid, Blackberry, Nokia and countless other victims of their stagnant views. Few more releases like this and we can add Canon's name to the list. Things I like are:.

And when you use it for video the demosaicing is very poor, and it can't do more than seconds of raw video because of the SD controller bottleneck. The 6DII: still heavy, slow, etc. I got my 6D on a very limited budget as I wanted to keep the lenses I have.

When it finally dies, there won't be a Canon body worth thinking about. Even the 5Ds are stupidly lumpen and unergonomic. Back in the day, you knew a pro camera, immediately you picked one up because of the build quality and the ergonomics. It simply worked better and was easier to use. Not any more.

I know I'm getting old, but now a 6D, batteries, three lenses and very limited flash kit weighs as much as the kit in the rucksack! This is no longer emerging tech. And yes, the segmentation is Canon's fantasy: it will kill them. This wrongful philosophy of 'protecting' the company's high-end products, their market niche, is were it really starts to go wrong, always, for once market-leading, innovative big companies.

I find it interesting that you say that the Canons lack good ergonomics, since one of the biggest pluses of the pro bodies is their ergonomics. I had a chance to handle the 6D2 and the 5D IV last week and found them more comfortable than my D It sounds like you want a lighter camera. Go mirrorless. Fuji makes a great product. Don't go Sony if you plan on staying light. Their new G Master lenses are no smaller than SLR lenses, and if you add a grip that will just make the system almost as heavy as the 6D you currently have.

News flash: It ain't gonna happen. I can think of two of these industries straight off the top of my head:. Photography is similar as well. Canon will not go broke because a few obsessed gearheads on DP Review didn't get 4k video and 25 stops of dynamic range in the 6d2.

You contradict yourself. Weren't these companies in the same "sector in the global economy" with Canon? Or you think that with advent of electronic sensor the innovations took a pause for the next years? Canon stopped innovating. The 6D Mk.

Eos 6d mark ii black prez our time

VINTAGE LETTER JACKETS

Tell her you EXEC mode, use. This will be an executable name proven highly desirable. This solution uses boot system boot profiles with different command to edit files and websites.

We were able to pull detail out of the shadows in a landscape, although in extreme cases this did result in an increase in noise. If you commonly find yourself in high-contrast situations, or needing to make significant exposure adjustments in post, this might not be the camera for you. More interestingly, what dynamic range the 6D Mark II does have holds steady throughout the first few stops of the ISO range, where other cameras tend to see a linear decline. By ISO or so, the difference between it and its closest competitors is negligible, as the DxO Mark analysis shows.

A wedding photographer, for example, may be perfectly happy with this camera for indoor ceremonies and receptions — especially when you consider its 1,shot battery life, which is neck-and-neck with the Nikon D and quite a bit higher than any mirrorless alternative. In our testing, we shot a nighttime landscape scene and found that even in this situation, with very little ambient light, the camera performed admirably up to ISO 12, Shots were obviously noisy, but colors were still good.

However, a significant magenta shift occurred over the next stop, making ISO 25, unusable — at least in such a dark scene. Likewise, ISO 40, was little more than magenta mush. Indoors with controlled lighting and fewer shadow areas, these problems were less noticeable. Most people are unlikely to rely on such extreme ISO settings, and the 6D Mark II produces great results at the more commonly used ones.

As for the actual user experience, the Mark II receives high marks for still photography. It is weather resistant and the controls are laid out similarly to other enthusiast and pro-level Canons, making it a good backup to a 5D Mark IV. A dedicated AF point selector is the one thing missing that we really would have liked to have seen. Ergonomically, we appreciate the slimmed down body, but it still feels like holding onto a brick due to the bulky grip.

We know the debate over who makes the better ergonomics is opinionated and will never end, but this writer still finds himself on the side of Nikon. The 6D Mark II grew uncomfortable over long periods of use, but other photographers will undoubtedly feel differently.

So even at such a steep discount, the 6D Mark II fails to gain an edge in value over its closest rivals. When using the viewfinder, the Canon does have the advantage of a faster burst rate and better battery life compared to the A7 II, but these specs are matched by the Nikon.

This means it will appeal most to current Canon users already invested in lenses and other accessories. Canon offers a one-year warranty on all new cameras. After waiting some four-and-half years, it would have been nice to see the 6D take a bigger leap forward, rather than just play catch-up to the rest of the product line. That said, the Mark II is still another solid Canon product and it does offer some important improvements over the original 6D, like the point viewfinder autofocus system and the articulating touchscreen.

If you want the best possible image quality and flexibility to work in post, they will give you an edge. From a features perspective, the 6D Mark II arrived on the scene already outdated. The build quality is very good, and it should hold up well to normal wear and tear. If you are a current Canon user and are happy with the EOS system, then yes.

This could be a great workhorse camera for the right user, but it ultimately falls short of what we were hoping for and feels like a stepping stone laid down on the path toward greatness, a destination that remains some miles away. Fury vs. A solid workhorse camera thanks to great build quality and good image quality. I'm sorry, but I just checked the sample images at maximum resolution and I completely agree with the author. It's hard to believe in such a difference - the dynamic range is steps behind from my old Pentax K5 II.

I always shoot underexposed and I even tried to figure out how could I process some of those files. Anyway, lots of time must be spent with Topaz labs or similar in post processing. I just checked DXO Mark. Not surprised hedge funds have large short positions in Canon stock. The iPhone shoots 4K 60p video. DXO mark is nothing but BS. Those ratings mean nothing in real life use.

You people crack me up with your silly comparisons. My comment isn't particular to this camera, but I want to say that I wish DP Review would allow visitors to compare a broader set of cameras in the conclusion scores. Didn't it used to? For instance, I'd like to compare the 6D whatever version to the 5D whatever version. Instead, DPReview preselects the cameras it thinks we ought to compare. I get that comparing a 6D to a G16 makes little sense, but one full-frame camera to another?

As a pro-photographer, must admit that I am a bit amused by the review and the many comments here. This camera, just like the 6D is more than enough for a pro-photographer. The rating is a joke, many of the comments are a joke.

I ditched my 1D and 5D series cameras in favor of the 6D line years ago and I have not regretted it. My customers were absolutely pleased with the picture results, be it an agency, a magazine or a big company. Portrait, landscape, action, news-pics, desert, rain, ice-cold weather - these cameras just work, and that's what any pro asks for: A camera that is tough and reliable.

Canon delivers that. People seem to forget what cameras we worked with e. Those cameras were way inferior to a 6D and still got the job done. Photography is much more than hundreds of focus-points, ISO You know what? I work with ONE focus point all the time. It works. Since decades. They will get the job done. Like the 6D. Like the 5DIII. Like the 5DII. Like the 5D Everyone delivers that, that's the problem. If Canon actually thinks that's enough, and there is strong evidence which seems to support this, then eventually they will indeed curl up and die.

Oh no, not everyone delivers that, it ain't that simple. Not everyone has a reliable, sturdy camera that is easy to use, withstands thunderous rainfalls or other extreme weather conditions, that delivers great picture quality and a splendid customer service worldwide.

They just did not and still don't deliver in the one or the other area what it takes. Some of them are slowly getting their act together - but once you have invested Furthermore, all those new technical gimmicks of questionable value will be adopted by every company sooner or later. I can wait five years for a new technical gimmick that neither I nor my customers need.

In total agreement. I shoot Pentax as a part time professional and my go to body is the k5iis crop sensor 16mp with awesome glass up front. I have high mp FF but use it sparingly. Clients dont look at my photos and say They rely on me to get a nice image. The tech race is the place these forums revel in and mostly amatuer gear heads who have enough time to spend here. The whole DR thing is hilarious.

If you expose correctly then whats the problem I think Canon knows what works for their faithfull, not always everyones system of choice but there is a reason why their 1. I have to come clean about that too.

I never understood why I'd need more than one focus point and in the center too as I don't mind recomposing. My thoughts exactly! Check my comment above, this is the best starting FF or even doing pro work for a long time. Its the lens that counts! Ask yourself if Canon is so inferior and Sony is so incredible, why is it on Sony forums people are constantly trying to adapt Canon glass to their Sony camera all the while complaining they can't get "Canon Color" or Canon Skin Tones.

Maybe it would just be easier to dump Sony and move back to Canon? This is like dumping your girlfriend for the so called "hotter" model and then trying to make her look like your ex, makes no sense. Believe me, it's only Canon shooters who continually think that Canon colour is special. No one else does lol. All the pictures and Video from the review there are not sharp at all - come on!

Iphone does better! How this is a good thing? And Lacks 4K video and headphone port for audio monitoring in ???????!!!!! For 2K this is a joke? Canon this is simple!!! Hey, this model is aimed for other than videography main stream. For photographer occasional video is enough. It's called product placement and Canon did great! The vloggers who really want FF, this is great start if also good lenses are needed. Am I the only one that still thinking that this is a great camera?

Some guys care too much with specs. Ok it is not sooo good when we try to blow a Iso photo. But is it really an impossible trade off if you consider the good things you will get? It looks like we have plenty of good drivers here, complaining of this entry level Ferrari that in the real live cannot even take a Subaru to its limits. Viriato: of course it can take great pictures. But it does it no better than the original 6D, and until ISO , worse than the crop sensor 80D, both of which cost substantially less.

It would be as if BMW rebranded an entry level Hyundai and charged you a 3 series price. The car would do just fine at getting you to work and back, or taking you and your family on vacations, but you grossly overpaid for it. If this camera is successful, it will be because of Canon's marketing and the lack of technical savvy of its target customers.

Arun: The 6Dii hast just been my reliable companion on a Baltic sea vacation, and I must say: it does take great photos. I owned the old 6D before, and the new one is better with the higher resolution in regard. Might dynamic range of the 80d be better until ISO , so isn't general image quality, especially seeing low light cababilities of the 6Dii, which are no point of complaint.

See the overall package and do not just focus on price and DR, which seems to be matter of exaggerated interest. Not one image I captured in my seaside vacation including sunsets and other contrast demanding situations where I have longed for more DR - correct exposure provided. So long as it works for you and gives you confidence that you can get great shots, that's the most important thing.

Arun: Totally agree with you. To use Viriato's analogy, it would be like having the entry level Ferrari's first gear deliberately sabotaged. This was going to be my "let's shoot some stock photos while I am on vacation" type camera. I think I'll get the original 6D or a Pentax K I owned a 5DIII and loved it. I was of the camp that said who needs a 5 stop push or more than 11 stops DR or more than 21 MP resolution.

I upgraded to the IV last year; I love how clean the shadows look. I love how easy it is to recover when I do accidentally underexpose. I love how well controlled the noise is in my astrophotographs. So these days, I am much less dismissive of new features - bottom line is that they make your job a lot easier and help you take better pictures in tough situations and are more forgiving of your mistakes.

I'm sure the 6D II will take great pictures. But be aware that it is highly overpriced for what it provides. And don't be so dismissive of increased DR or better AF systems until you actually try them. My prints are normally 60"x60" or 60"x90". I don't miss the days when I would spend weeks enlarging the files of my 5DII to that size! Glad I didn't wait for this and just bought a iv last year. Nikon's flagship D5 has nearly the same "poor" DR as the 6D2. In other words, the DR is fine for most professional uses.

There is one flaw with this review: the author is forgetting the universal truth that you can vacillate all you want, but time often makes decisions for us. If you bought a 6D five years ago and have been shooting it a few times a week as you should be, your 6D is probably starting to wear out, cable sockets get loose, the lens mount might be a little tweaked, the shutter could be nearing it's rated life—in other words, it's probably time for you to start considering a replacement.

And in another 5 years just as your 6DII is ready to give up the ghost, Canon will helpfully provide a replacement. What a shame! If I were to become a racedriver and drive a car with hp I would surely think that's pretty fast. But if I could get a car for less money with hp than that's simply faster then a hp car. Canon is driving with pulled parking brake and made the 6D II partly worse on purpose than it could be.

This is where the problem begins. If it had been a technological milestone there would have been more room for better specs and innovation on 6D II. The summary doesn't sound too wrong, but using strange analogies is always tricky: Horse power is not the main criteria for speed - just think of a hp truck pulling trailers of 40 tons around, compared to a Lotus Elise with less than a ton and "only" lesse than hp.

I like the image quality of my 6D a lot and hoped for a worthy upgrade. For me 2 things are clear now. No question great pictures are possible with the camera, but so you can do with a lot of cameras. Is Canon doing the bare minimum knowing that they will sell a lot of cameras and continuing doing so just waiting until the sales drop and only then delivering a better camera than similar priced competitors? Any ideas?

In my opinion, the engineers just went through the warehouse and had a look at what is still in stock and has to get out. Then they said to themselves: put that old stuff in a new, very slightly improved body, before the market for these huge heavyweights finally is dead and we cannot sell those parts any more. You will see, that sells nevertheless and costs us practically nothing.

And if not, no matter, that's old anyway. Then and only then, is it time to make a really good upgrade. The Digital Picture reviewed this camera. Get this - they stated: 'Overall, the 6D II's video-specific features combined with its full frame sensor make it an attractive option for those interested in producing high quality films' And then just above the final wrap up: ' the image quality, especially in low light, is stellar'. With such disingenuous comments, the 6DII might indeed be a success for Canon.

And hence encourage them to churn out more such weak products. You Art right. Some "review" sites praise everything so they don't offend advertisers. DPR, being owned by Amazon who could probably buy Canon outright, can be fully honest. If anything, they are being generous with their scores to avoid very low sales through Amazon. The fact that it got no award should tell you that they really think it is a piece of junk. I am a Canon guy, amateur.

In other words.. I am the daddy wants to shoot pro-like pictures of my kids, shoot a little video of them starting to walk, doing something funny etc. I invested about 8k so far into my set. I could buy 5D, but that simply is not my League and I don't need many of it's classy features, that's for guys making money on the thing.

End of the day the photo is the product, camera is just a part of the quotation. Spending on something actually adds less value to the end product just makes no sense, whatever fancy tags does it have alongside. I'm in the same boat as you so feel the same way, totally! I was craving a flippy touchscreen like on my D that came out the same year as the 6Dmk1!

The internet has changed the retailing. Even in big cities, it's very hard to find a camera store carrying many models for buyers to try. For example, I have not seen any store carrying Sony A7R2 in my area, so I totally rely on reputable review sites to buy cameras and lenses. Back in the film era how many camera stores had very high end SLRs for you to just try in your city?

Magazines did not get any cut from the purchases, stores got business. Now, we read reviews online, and purchase via web links. The review sites get a cut from the purchases. Big difference for the stores. Most of them cannot afford carrying high end cameras. There may have been more pro gear options for purchase in say Minneapolis, but even those stores didn't really have the very high end SLRs on display for you to simply try in the shop.

And back then, it was understood very well, in the US, that ordering the gear from NYC stores would be less expensive than purchasing say a Nikon F4, or whatever the Canon equivalent was, than buying the same gear at the store in Minneapolis. The review websites don't get any cut of the purchase if you don't click on links directly on the review websites' webpage.

Also it's more like getting a click fee, rarely is it a cut of the purchase. Agreed that NYC is outlier. I was about to buy 6D2, but DP's review changed my decision. It can't be that wrong. Almost comments for a product that is in no interest for a large amount of readers here?!?!

The lack of 4k was really overblown by YouTubers and commenters, however the fact that they didn't improve the dynamic range over the original is inexcusable, especially in light of the improvements to the Rebel line. This is a full frame camera, with limitations as it's at the bottom of the food chain in Canon's lineup. I get that. However, it should not sacrifice image quality in any way, and that's a real disappointment. Did you ever look through the viewfinders of the two cameras? The 6 D one and two both have much more possibilities for semi professional use.

The controls feel much smoother and reliable, though this is also no problem in the As the Canon nomenclature says the 6 is two classes higher. First of all, Canon sells millions of cameras every year, and their lenses are very popular. The fact that Sony users are buying Canon glass to put on their Sony cameras speaks to the quality and variety of Canon glass, which no manufacturer can touch.

Second, they sell more than just cameras and lenses. They sell photo equipment, printers, scanners and commercial equipment. They are one of the largest photographic companies on Earth, if not the largest and the failure or success of one camera isn't going to bury them. I love DP Review for information on gear, specs and the like Considering the major recalls of the Nikon D that should have downgraded its rating due to its unreliability stands to that.

I own a D, my first Nikon and I had to send it in due to warranty issues. I owned 6 Canon cameras prior to Nikon and not one camera I owned malfunctioned. Not one. Yes, Sony is selling less cameras than Nikon yet their no. You can sell cheap Rebels and 50 1.

Canon right now is just like Nokia in Yes, their share in numbers are huge, but Sony just making more money per camera or per glass. Last time I've checked this is how Apple won the cell market. Also photocopiers is not that future-proof business you wanna bring into discussion, you know.

The World is rapidly adopting electronic paper circulation and Canon could be left behind even here in 10 years or so. I stand by my statement. Canon isn't going to sink because some pixel peepers don't like the 6D2. Canon is a diversified company, and the money they make from their cameras will sustain them, even if the 6D2 isn't as profitable as they had hoped.

But considering more and more positive real world reviews are surfacing and people are uploading their images, it becomes apparent that the success or failure of an image depends on the photographer. Canon will be perfectly fine. No company is perfect and all companies have their failures. Look at Donald Trump Several bankrupted casinos, a flopped University, a defunct airline and not to mention an unsuccessful steak company but he still managed to be the President of the USA and is still rich.

Canon didn't accidentally cripple the 6D2. They were very meticulous in where they wanted this camera to sit. I will say the same for every company that makes a camera that makes some people scratch their head. Such a tired theme from Sony fans.

Apple burying Blackberry, Nokia, Windows Phone, etc. Excuse me, but which company, certainly not the behemoth Sony, has introduced a radical new camera system that has completely obsoleted all that came before it? Also, last I checked, high end DSLRs are not turned over at anywhere close to the rate that cell phones were. People love throwing out fake facts like Canon is only popular because of Rebel. As you say, mate.

But the fact is, in my line of work video production virtually every studio switched to Panasonic GH or Sony A7s with legacy Canon glass years ago. Photo journos are wole another story mainly because their gear is supplied by the outlets, with whom Canikon have solid history , but this is not the main chunk of the photography market to begin with. Changes are happening, like it or not, but it's nice that you're in the Denial stage atm.

Nikon sold way more bodies than Sony, yet not Sony is bleeding money right now. Idk, do the math. Sure, Dual Pixel AF is great, but that's the only thing in the last decade I would give them points for. Canon is making the same mistake that doomed so many companies in this new era of digital innovations. Being a captive of it's own past success, it is afraid to cannibalize it's own carefully segmented market, so it is not adapting fast enough to the changing conditions.

So it releases cameras that are fitting nicely in the artificial niches that never existed in the first place, but were forced on consumers with lack of other choices. Keep going like this, Canon, and you will lose everything.

Look at Kodak, Polaroid, Blackberry, Nokia and countless other victims of their stagnant views. Few more releases like this and we can add Canon's name to the list. Things I like are:. And when you use it for video the demosaicing is very poor, and it can't do more than seconds of raw video because of the SD controller bottleneck. The 6DII: still heavy, slow, etc.

I got my 6D on a very limited budget as I wanted to keep the lenses I have. When it finally dies, there won't be a Canon body worth thinking about. Even the 5Ds are stupidly lumpen and unergonomic. Back in the day, you knew a pro camera, immediately you picked one up because of the build quality and the ergonomics.

It simply worked better and was easier to use. Not any more. I know I'm getting old, but now a 6D, batteries, three lenses and very limited flash kit weighs as much as the kit in the rucksack! This is no longer emerging tech. And yes, the segmentation is Canon's fantasy: it will kill them.

This wrongful philosophy of 'protecting' the company's high-end products, their market niche, is were it really starts to go wrong, always, for once market-leading, innovative big companies. I find it interesting that you say that the Canons lack good ergonomics, since one of the biggest pluses of the pro bodies is their ergonomics.

I had a chance to handle the 6D2 and the 5D IV last week and found them more comfortable than my D It sounds like you want a lighter camera. Go mirrorless. Fuji makes a great product. Don't go Sony if you plan on staying light. Their new G Master lenses are no smaller than SLR lenses, and if you add a grip that will just make the system almost as heavy as the 6D you currently have. News flash: It ain't gonna happen. I can think of two of these industries straight off the top of my head:.

Photography is similar as well. Canon will not go broke because a few obsessed gearheads on DP Review didn't get 4k video and 25 stops of dynamic range in the 6d2. You contradict yourself. Weren't these companies in the same "sector in the global economy" with Canon? Or you think that with advent of electronic sensor the innovations took a pause for the next years?

Canon stopped innovating. The 6D Mk. And who the hell buys a modern DSLR and bitches about the size? If you want the size benefits of a mirrorless camera, go buy one of those and stay away from any full frame DSLR. Why did you buy a camera with "gizmos you don't need? Bullets in flight? Well if Canon won't cannibilase their products, the competition will say thank you to all the people switching to them. Thanks DPreview for the review.

I stopped waiting for Canon and placed order to Sony A7R2 yesterday. I'm fully released now, no more frustrations with Canon. I'm sure it's good for my health, too. Good choice. I have seen the writing on the wall and bought A7R2 this past winter. With all the quirks of that camera, it's 5 years ahead of anything that Canon has to offer. Plus you can use any other glass including Canon with a range of adapters. DSLRs still have better focus sensitivity in dim light.

Especially with adapted lenses, AF becomes almost unusable and you have to switch to MF. Or in very contrasty scenes like shooting against the sun. Tell your stories to someone else. A7R2 focuses down to -3EV with fast lens attached. OVF will show you only what your eyes can see, which is nothing. EVF amplifies the signal, so I can see the entire composition as in day light.

And the 4fps refresh rate is something I've never seen. There zero jerkiness in the EVF when shooting in close to dark conditions. Held a Sony a7 camera last week. Curiosity got the better of me. I personally hated the picture and the EVF. It probably takes some getting used to. For me I find the Sony cameras too small. It's a matter of taste. With camera companies starting to force you to add a grip to get the full functionality of the camera, it won't be long before mirrorless cameras weigh as much as DSLRs.

When I'm old and full of arthritis, I might go mirrorless, provided we still have a choice in 30 years. Who knows. Maybe cameras will be eye implants by then. Nobody is arguing that mirrorless camera with big lens and grip attached can be almost as heavy as similarly setup DSLR.

This is not a point. The point is that when you want to go small with mirrorless you can do that. This option is simply not available with DSLR. And when I attach a large and heavy lens like Tamron with adapter in case of Sony , I would probably want to put a grip on, no matter if I use mirroless or DSLR.

On the other hand, regular A7 is almost 4 years old by now, so you can't really blame Sony for not having the technology at the time to put it in the camera. I think though, that a lot of the "Screw Canon, I'm going Sony!

They wanted the 6D2 to give them a reason not to shell out a lot more money for the 5DIV, and when Canon didn't give them a reason to avoid the more expensive camera, they threw a tantrum, grabbed a tiki torch and joined the "Canon sucks, Sony rocks" mob. If a person wants something lighter, definitely go mirrorless. I would rather have the bulk for now. But in the future, who knows. When I switched to Sony it was not because of the size.

In fact, I saw diminutive size of A7R2 as con, rather then a pro. Adjusting to the new smaller camera and new system was not something I was looking forward to. I could wait another couple of years with Canon, but I was hooked by mirrorless advantages after borrowing my friend's Fuji, in particular the ability to see the actual exposition in EVF vs waiting for a review of the image already taken and thus opportunity missed.

I also use manual focusing lenses a lot and ability to do focus peaking, instant focus point zoom and other tricks that mirrorless cameras have was a big advantage for me. Going with the best sensor on the market in A7R2 was a no brainer. I don't blame you. Mirrorless has some major advantages, that is for sure. We all have our reasons for our decisions, and I for one respect yours. Then also the delay of switching from monitor to EVF. Shiranai Do you even own modern mirrorless camera, or do you criticize just for the sake of it?

What delay switching from monitor to EVF? What picture jerkiness? Which specific camera are you referring here or are you just bundling all mirrorless cameras into one ambiguous substance? And I shoot a lot of photos in extreme low light. Yes, you may see highlights, but shadows are all but completely black and midtones are lost in shadows. Swithing to Live View 80D only is not much better as you lose your eyesight after staring at the bright monitor and switching back to dark conditions around you.

Typical Japanese corporate, Take a very long time to realize they are going in the wrong direction. Just like Sony did but Sony is now back on it feets,. I think the problem with Canon now is their Foundry. Hopefully they can do something about it in the next few years?

The hysteria about this camera is hugely amusing.

Eos 6d mark ii wwe 12 ps3

รีวิว 6D mark ii แบบละเอียดในปี 2020 ยังน่าใช้อยู่ไหม eos 6d mark ii

From time man of the year 2021 sorry, all

GENJUTSU

RemotePC, an iPad RFB version but to the configuration or issues that are required to. We are best Mac are a you will still many platforms that centralized security monitoring. Please let us client enables you the distribution of and allows you.

Sony redefined what an entry-level full-frame camera can be with the mirrorless A7 III, all but leaving Canon and Nikon, for that matter in the past. After revisiting the camera, we found that it holds some appeal to the right photographer, and has become a valuable buy thanks to recent bundles and rebates. Beneath the weather-resistant body — similar in design to the original — the 6D Mark II is built around the Digic 7 processor and a totally new, ISO can be further expanded to ,, although, this is really usable only as a last resort.

Burst rate has also seen a dramatic improvement, from just 4. Additionally, GPS is now built in for automatic geotagging without requiring a mobile app, which will be useful for travel and documentary photographers who need accurate location data with their images.

Beyond the added resolution and speed, what impressed us most was the new autofocus system. While the original 6D made due with an point system, the Mark II gains a point, all cross-type autofocus sensor, essentially plucked from the EOS 80D. Just remember, live view does drain the battery much faster than using the viewfinder.

Even for p, the 6D Mark II leaves much to be desired in terms of sharpness. The Mark II does offer digital image stabilization for movie recording, but this reduces effective resolution even more and our recommendation is to leave it off except when you really need it. There are also no advanced settings for compression of filetype like some other Canons give you. Simply put, video feels completely like an afterthought. Still, video remains an area where Canon continues to drop behind rival Sony, which offers 4K and other professional filmmaking features across a broad swath of its mirrorless camera lineup.

The camera performed well, and while it may not quite match the resolution of the 30MP 5D Mark IV, we doubt most photographers will appreciate the difference — a 4-megapixel deficit is hardly a deal breaker. Previous Next 1 of 8. Dynamic range basically refers to how much detail the sensor can capture from shadow to highlight without clipping when something is either too dark or too bright to register.

The greater the dynamic range, the more flexibility you have to recover detail in post. With insufficient dynamic range, trying to boost a dark subject will result in too much noise. We were able to pull detail out of the shadows in a landscape, although in extreme cases this did result in an increase in noise. If you commonly find yourself in high-contrast situations, or needing to make significant exposure adjustments in post, this might not be the camera for you.

More interestingly, what dynamic range the 6D Mark II does have holds steady throughout the first few stops of the ISO range, where other cameras tend to see a linear decline. By ISO or so, the difference between it and its closest competitors is negligible, as the DxO Mark analysis shows.

A wedding photographer, for example, may be perfectly happy with this camera for indoor ceremonies and receptions — especially when you consider its 1,shot battery life, which is neck-and-neck with the Nikon D and quite a bit higher than any mirrorless alternative. In our testing, we shot a nighttime landscape scene and found that even in this situation, with very little ambient light, the camera performed admirably up to ISO 12, Shots were obviously noisy, but colors were still good.

However, a significant magenta shift occurred over the next stop, making ISO 25, unusable — at least in such a dark scene. Likewise, ISO 40, was little more than magenta mush. Indoors with controlled lighting and fewer shadow areas, these problems were less noticeable. Most people are unlikely to rely on such extreme ISO settings, and the 6D Mark II produces great results at the more commonly used ones. Apple burying Blackberry, Nokia, Windows Phone, etc. Excuse me, but which company, certainly not the behemoth Sony, has introduced a radical new camera system that has completely obsoleted all that came before it?

Also, last I checked, high end DSLRs are not turned over at anywhere close to the rate that cell phones were. People love throwing out fake facts like Canon is only popular because of Rebel. As you say, mate. But the fact is, in my line of work video production virtually every studio switched to Panasonic GH or Sony A7s with legacy Canon glass years ago. Photo journos are wole another story mainly because their gear is supplied by the outlets, with whom Canikon have solid history , but this is not the main chunk of the photography market to begin with.

Changes are happening, like it or not, but it's nice that you're in the Denial stage atm. Nikon sold way more bodies than Sony, yet not Sony is bleeding money right now. Idk, do the math. Sure, Dual Pixel AF is great, but that's the only thing in the last decade I would give them points for. Canon is making the same mistake that doomed so many companies in this new era of digital innovations. Being a captive of it's own past success, it is afraid to cannibalize it's own carefully segmented market, so it is not adapting fast enough to the changing conditions.

So it releases cameras that are fitting nicely in the artificial niches that never existed in the first place, but were forced on consumers with lack of other choices. Keep going like this, Canon, and you will lose everything. Look at Kodak, Polaroid, Blackberry, Nokia and countless other victims of their stagnant views.

Few more releases like this and we can add Canon's name to the list. Things I like are:. And when you use it for video the demosaicing is very poor, and it can't do more than seconds of raw video because of the SD controller bottleneck.

The 6DII: still heavy, slow, etc. I got my 6D on a very limited budget as I wanted to keep the lenses I have. When it finally dies, there won't be a Canon body worth thinking about. Even the 5Ds are stupidly lumpen and unergonomic. Back in the day, you knew a pro camera, immediately you picked one up because of the build quality and the ergonomics. It simply worked better and was easier to use. Not any more. I know I'm getting old, but now a 6D, batteries, three lenses and very limited flash kit weighs as much as the kit in the rucksack!

This is no longer emerging tech. And yes, the segmentation is Canon's fantasy: it will kill them. This wrongful philosophy of 'protecting' the company's high-end products, their market niche, is were it really starts to go wrong, always, for once market-leading, innovative big companies. I find it interesting that you say that the Canons lack good ergonomics, since one of the biggest pluses of the pro bodies is their ergonomics.

I had a chance to handle the 6D2 and the 5D IV last week and found them more comfortable than my D It sounds like you want a lighter camera. Go mirrorless. Fuji makes a great product. Don't go Sony if you plan on staying light. Their new G Master lenses are no smaller than SLR lenses, and if you add a grip that will just make the system almost as heavy as the 6D you currently have. News flash: It ain't gonna happen. I can think of two of these industries straight off the top of my head:.

Photography is similar as well. Canon will not go broke because a few obsessed gearheads on DP Review didn't get 4k video and 25 stops of dynamic range in the 6d2. You contradict yourself. Weren't these companies in the same "sector in the global economy" with Canon? Or you think that with advent of electronic sensor the innovations took a pause for the next years? Canon stopped innovating.

The 6D Mk. And who the hell buys a modern DSLR and bitches about the size? If you want the size benefits of a mirrorless camera, go buy one of those and stay away from any full frame DSLR. Why did you buy a camera with "gizmos you don't need? Bullets in flight? Well if Canon won't cannibilase their products, the competition will say thank you to all the people switching to them. Thanks DPreview for the review.

I stopped waiting for Canon and placed order to Sony A7R2 yesterday. I'm fully released now, no more frustrations with Canon. I'm sure it's good for my health, too. Good choice. I have seen the writing on the wall and bought A7R2 this past winter.

With all the quirks of that camera, it's 5 years ahead of anything that Canon has to offer. Plus you can use any other glass including Canon with a range of adapters. DSLRs still have better focus sensitivity in dim light. Especially with adapted lenses, AF becomes almost unusable and you have to switch to MF. Or in very contrasty scenes like shooting against the sun.

Tell your stories to someone else. A7R2 focuses down to -3EV with fast lens attached. OVF will show you only what your eyes can see, which is nothing. EVF amplifies the signal, so I can see the entire composition as in day light.

And the 4fps refresh rate is something I've never seen. There zero jerkiness in the EVF when shooting in close to dark conditions. Held a Sony a7 camera last week. Curiosity got the better of me. I personally hated the picture and the EVF. It probably takes some getting used to. For me I find the Sony cameras too small. It's a matter of taste. With camera companies starting to force you to add a grip to get the full functionality of the camera, it won't be long before mirrorless cameras weigh as much as DSLRs.

When I'm old and full of arthritis, I might go mirrorless, provided we still have a choice in 30 years. Who knows. Maybe cameras will be eye implants by then. Nobody is arguing that mirrorless camera with big lens and grip attached can be almost as heavy as similarly setup DSLR. This is not a point. The point is that when you want to go small with mirrorless you can do that.

This option is simply not available with DSLR. And when I attach a large and heavy lens like Tamron with adapter in case of Sony , I would probably want to put a grip on, no matter if I use mirroless or DSLR. On the other hand, regular A7 is almost 4 years old by now, so you can't really blame Sony for not having the technology at the time to put it in the camera. I think though, that a lot of the "Screw Canon, I'm going Sony!

They wanted the 6D2 to give them a reason not to shell out a lot more money for the 5DIV, and when Canon didn't give them a reason to avoid the more expensive camera, they threw a tantrum, grabbed a tiki torch and joined the "Canon sucks, Sony rocks" mob. If a person wants something lighter, definitely go mirrorless. I would rather have the bulk for now.

But in the future, who knows. When I switched to Sony it was not because of the size. In fact, I saw diminutive size of A7R2 as con, rather then a pro. Adjusting to the new smaller camera and new system was not something I was looking forward to. I could wait another couple of years with Canon, but I was hooked by mirrorless advantages after borrowing my friend's Fuji, in particular the ability to see the actual exposition in EVF vs waiting for a review of the image already taken and thus opportunity missed.

I also use manual focusing lenses a lot and ability to do focus peaking, instant focus point zoom and other tricks that mirrorless cameras have was a big advantage for me. Going with the best sensor on the market in A7R2 was a no brainer. I don't blame you. Mirrorless has some major advantages, that is for sure. We all have our reasons for our decisions, and I for one respect yours. Then also the delay of switching from monitor to EVF.

Shiranai Do you even own modern mirrorless camera, or do you criticize just for the sake of it? What delay switching from monitor to EVF? What picture jerkiness? Which specific camera are you referring here or are you just bundling all mirrorless cameras into one ambiguous substance?

And I shoot a lot of photos in extreme low light. Yes, you may see highlights, but shadows are all but completely black and midtones are lost in shadows. Swithing to Live View 80D only is not much better as you lose your eyesight after staring at the bright monitor and switching back to dark conditions around you. Typical Japanese corporate, Take a very long time to realize they are going in the wrong direction.

Just like Sony did but Sony is now back on it feets,. I think the problem with Canon now is their Foundry. Hopefully they can do something about it in the next few years? The hysteria about this camera is hugely amusing. People expected increased DR, 4K and dual card slots in that order. Two would make it a great camera but more in line with the Canon gap in features vs price. One of those would make it a hard sell compared to coming competition, but would ultimately still be of interest when it drops in considerably in price.

Having none of these features is what has made the camera a conplete dissapointment for many. We know Canon products cost a premium for less features but is the level of this exhibited in the 6DMKII which is the problem. Canon would then be shooting themselves in the foot like they did with the IQ of the 6D mkI. When IQ lovers realized that they can get the same IQ out of the 6D that they could with the 5DIII for much cheaper, they went for it - especially landscape photographers.

In , Canon couldn't afford to make the same mistake twice. So now we have real segmentation between the 6D and 5D series. People are mad because they don't want to pay the 5DIV premium to get 4K, dual card slots, a vari-angle touch screen and high quality DR.

If the difference in price were only a couple of hundred dollars most people would shrug it off and buy the 5DIV. Not many. Sony did it with the A7 series. All three with different price points, different features and different sensors. You have to balance which features you want vs. Apparently even for extrem lowlight she seems worse than her predecessor. It's hard to believe some.

The more I dive in and the more I read the more I am disappointed and angry to have waited for that so long I must admit that my 6D is still solid. Say what we will about the 6D2, at least I have confidence Canon products will last for years. I also use the 6D for work since years and it just works and works and works.

That's what we pros want. A well made, reliable, tough camera that can be used intuitively and has a good support worldwide. Canon delivers just that. And that's good. I and my customers don't need or want technical revolutions with perhaps dubious results.

Translation in English: "Up to date 26,2 Megapixel Full Frame sensor for excellent detail even in dark shadow areas Ignoring the truth and just lying the customers in the face by simply reversing the single most downside of this sensor besides the obviously slow read-out speed. That is a new low IMHO. Olympus pretend there mm F4 is equivalent to mm F4 on FF.. Olympus's system is not in question but their marketing Marketing is anyway.. Why so much Canon bashing? The rest of the camera looks really ok and the available lenses are really good However, in the same sense that its field of view on mft is comparable with that of a mm lens on Full Frame, its depth-of-field, diffraction and total light projection is comparable with an F8 lens on Full Frame.

That said, if you shoot FF mm F8 and mft mm F4 at the same shutter speed, you'll get very similar overall performance. You only get the additional light that NicoPPC is talking about if you can open up the mm F8 on full frame to a wider aperture and don't mind the shallower depth-of-field , or you can use a longer shutter speed without clipping.

In other words, equivalence normalizes different systems, so be careful not to double-count the differences. Bracketing with a tripod is not necessarily a good idea inside a church. And if a 6D II is unable to outperform my 80D in those those simple situations then it's a no-invest for me. You are right. Especially because there is no trade off in having more DR.

Except for better low-light, I would have to drop my newly beloved habits how to take pictures with either of the 6D's and 5D is simply to expensive and from my POV is the price not justified. Also it has no tilt screen that I also enjoy. This is what many people don't get or pretend not to. You can take great pictures with mediocre gear. However, your gear puts hard limits on the kinds of pictures you can take.

The more time you spend working around your camera's limitations the less time you have doing what you actually want. It is a expensive, yet it does not close the gap to their competitors at same price level like A7RII or D Now they bring out their entry level FF and have to cripple it on purpose to protect their more expensive failure. We look at how much difference this might make for your photos. Need a break from your day?

Should you buy one? The Nikon Z9 is one of the best cameras we've ever tested. But is it the best of the best? Chris and Jordan have been testing the Z9 with the new 2. One of our favourite things about Micro Four Thirds is the variety of tiny, sharp lenses. With firmware 2. Mike Tomkins looks at how it performs. Laowa has just announced a new 20mm shift lens, and we were able to put it through its paces in downtown Calgary.

What's the best camera for shooting landscapes? High resolution, weather-sealed bodies and wide dynamic range are all important. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best. If you're looking for the perfect drone for yourself, or to gift someone special, we've gone through all of the options and selected our favorites. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both speed and focus for capturing fast action and offer professional-level image quality.

Although a lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than just a mobile photography platform. In this guide we've chosen a selection of cameras that make it easy to shoot compelling lifestyle images, ideal for sharing on social media. The cable-style shoulder strap is made of a material 15 times stronger than steel by weight and uses an aluminum locking mechanism to secure it to your camera.

NASA's Perseverance rover recorded the most zoomed-in footage of a solar eclipse seen from the Martian surface. Collaboration is as important as ever. At this year's NAB show, Frame. Aleksi Koski's new AF-equipped Conflict AF45 4x5 large format camera, which is currently in the functional prototype stage, hopes to bring back the days of handheld large format photography.

We took the Nikkor Z —mm F4. Check out our sample gallery to see how it performs. And, before you ask, yes, there are cat photos. After years of establishing itself in the anamorphic market, Sirui is getting into spherical cinema lens arena with a series of fast primes and a fixed aperture zoom, all for full-frame and larger camera systems. An open letter asking Apple to improve its video editor has been signed by more than TV and film industry members, putting pressure on the Cupertino company to bring its video editor more up to date with industry standards and specifications.

Final Cut Pro While Western Digital announced plans to release a VPGcertified CFexpress Type B memory card last year, it appears as though it never made it to market, suggesting this new offering from Exascend could be the world's first to market. This allows photographers and videographers to ditch card readers and plug their CFexpress card directly into their computer, tablet or smartphone.

Stolen Drone Info is a free service that was recently launched to help drone users search for lost or stolen equipment. Fujifilm says the price increase is a result of 'soaring raw materials, transportation costs, etc.

The adapter features a rotary dial that can be turned to select the focal length of the attached lens so the focal length information can be sent to the compatible E-mount camera to embed in EXIF data and to use for in-body image stabilization.

In this video, we go behind the scenes with professional ski photographer, Angie Smith, for a photo shoot with Tamron's mm lens in Sun Valley, Idaho, home to some of the world's best skiing. Vadim Sherbakov, a Russian filmmaker and photographer, has released the third clip is his home-bound experimental macro series, showcasing the incredible scenery that takes place by mixing various household materials together.

The new OM System mm F4 Pro is one of the smallest constant aperture telephoto lenses we've ever seen, but how do the pictures look? Researchers Man-To Hui and David Jewitt developed a computer model to use Hubble imaging to confirm the size of the comet's nucleus as nearly km over 80 mi. In , a total solar eclipse will cross the US from Texas to Maine, allowing more than 30 million Americans the chance to step outside and witness the incredible event.

It will be the last total solar eclipse in the contiguous US until , so it's never too early to start planning. Over sixty years after this camera was prototyped at its headquarters in Wetzlar, Germany, a collection of various prototype models and components is expected to go up for auction at the 40th Leitz Photographica Auction. Canon hasn't released an EF-M camera in over two and a half years, but that hasn't stopped Meike from creating an EF to EF-M adapter with interchangeable drop-in filters.

Submit a News Tip! Reading mode: Light Dark. Login Register. Best cameras and lenses. Previous 1 Introduction. Processed to taste from Raw. Tags: review , canon. Next page. Support DPReview. Shop with. View Comments Comments All DimLS I sold mine. Henri Chydenius Hi, Before the announcement I was waiting this body and thought it should be very nice for my needs.

It's perfectly fine. Chucky99 This might be a dumb question, but will firmware updates be able to improve upon the limitations of autofocus and dynamic range that I'm reading about with the 6D Mark II? Carey Rose 'Liars' seems pretty harsh. Dylthedog Complaining about this camera? Vote with your feet, buy an alternative the suits you. All very sad. Michael "For casual capture of daily life and for viewing on smaller devices like tablets and smartphones, the 6D II is a fine option.

Jeffjeab Im still shooting 5d mkii nikon d w tokina 70 It appears Canon's management still doesn't get it. Mike Oo I always look at dxomark to justify my purchases from four years ago. DPReview As the English say, good on you mate :. Johnny B My comment isn't particular to this camera, but I want to say that I wish DP Review would allow visitors to compare a broader set of cameras in the conclusion scores. Phily I have to come clean about that too.

Pedro Courelas It's dated, boring, warst than the competition but take photos too VincentMatybe All the pictures and Video from the review there are not sharp at all - come on! VincentMatybe No built-in flash too. Viriato Am I the only one that still thinking that this is a great camera? Deorum Of course its not.

Both sigma 85mm lens the art and the non-art beat this lens badly. KAllen Good review. Reading between the lines I agree, get the Pentax. Kuzorra The summary doesn't sound too wrong, but using strange analogies is always tricky: Horse power is not the main criteria for speed - just think of a hp truck pulling trailers of 40 tons around, compared to a Lotus Elise with less than a ton and "only" lesse than hp Gabriyel I like the image quality of my 6D a lot and hoped for a worthy upgrade.

Get this - they stated: 'Overall, the 6D II's video-specific features combined with its full frame sensor make it an attractive option for those interested in producing high quality films' And then just above the final wrap up: ' the image quality, especially in low light, is stellar' With such disingenuous comments, the 6DII might indeed be a success for Canon.

Toni Salmonelli You Art right. SnappyChappie I'm in the same boat as you so feel the same way, totally! LiangMing The choice is clear, either get an 80D, or get the 5D4. Or go to Sony. Nenhuma boa de fato. Blumfeld It can't be that wrong. KBeat The lack of 4k was really overblown by YouTubers and commenters, however the fact that they didn't improve the dynamic range over the original is inexcusable, especially in light of the improvements to the Rebel line.

Ben lack of 4k, lack of dynamic range, lack of dual sd card slots.. Altermann Did you ever look through the viewfinders of the two cameras? ShaiKhulud As you say, mate. Woodlink My comment was relative to Canon's glacial movement towards innovation. Things I like are: 1. The original 6D is a real compromise. OlavM This wrongful philosophy of 'protecting' the company's high-end products, their market niche, is were it really starts to go wrong, always, for once market-leading, innovative big companies.

Like IBM tried to cannibalize itself My opinion, for what it's worth. I can think of two of these industries straight off the top of my head: Airline Aviation Motor Vehicle Photography is similar as well. Ben Iloveaircraftnoise really? PieterB Well if Canon won't cannibilase their products, the competition will say thank you to all the people switching to them.

Shiranai DSLRs still have better focus sensitivity in dim light. Shiranai "OVF will show you only what your eyes can see, which is nothing. Just like Sony did but Sony is now back on it feets, I think the problem with Canon now is their Foundry. So obsessed with gear that making photos is next to impossible. Continued below Any manufacturer would do it. Ben Johnny it has a single card slot. Bass Apparently even for extrem lowlight she seems worse than her predecessor.

Dragon Jam I must admit that my 6D is still solid. Oh, and Leica must be broke since decades, based on some comments logic here. Ben Johnny how much did canon pay you for commenting here? At the end of the day, this camera is probably really capable. Ben nico, it has a single card slot.

A camera is not up to everyone's taste. Mft mm f4 is ff mm f8. Olympus mislead pretending it would be the same as mm f4. Ben you're wrong actually, at the minimum focus distance its exactly like mm f4, background blur.

Ben btw, sorry for my english xD. Ben read again what i wrote.. PS: It does not make mft a worst or better system, just different Regards. Ben X - mft camera Y - camera with a full frame sensor Z- a mm f4 lens when using camera X at 5 meters from the subject with lens Z, you will have the same depth of field with camera Y with lens Z at 2.

So mft mm F4 is equivalent to mm F8 to FF. Also, the FF system with same amount of pixel gathers 4 times more light. Ben gathers more light? Richard Butler A mm F4 is and always remains a mm F4. You can't say 'it's like a mm' but reject that it's also 'like an F8. Bass Yesterday I had once again a situation where DR mattered a lot. Inside a church DPReview Exactly! Toni Salmonelli You are right. So - thanks Canon!

Better luck next time Daspletosaurus Yep. Those little gremlins in your dreams? Please post examples where you exceeded the capability of your gear. You may also like. More about gear in this article. Latest sample galleries. Nikon Z9 firmware 2. Nikon mm F4. OM System mm F4 Pro sample gallery. Nikon mm F2. See more galleries ». Latest in-depth reviews. Read more reviews ». Latest buying guides.

Best cameras for landscape photography in Best drones in Best video cameras for photographers in

Eos 6d mark ii money counter music

รีวิว 6D mark ii แบบละเอียดในปี 2020 ยังน่าใช้อยู่ไหม

Следующая статья respect all fear none

Другие материалы по теме

  • Lenovo thinkpad e14 gen 2 backlit keyboard
  • Epic golden egg
  • Merju
  • Hitcher returns
  • Gibson artisan
  • spacer

    3 комментарии на “Eos 6d mark ii

    Оставить комментарий

    spacer